Talk:Taiwan's Constitutional Court legalizes gay marriage, gives legislators two years to amend marriage laws

Common knowledge

I am using my common knowledge to add the US and the UK as examples of countries legalizing same-sex marriage. Is that okay? --George Ho (talk) 04:45, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

If it's common knowledge it shouldn't be that hard to source it. Better to stop a small deal before it becomes a big deal. But I could post here and whine at you to do better or I could take two seconds and find some sources: U.S. England and WalesDarkfrog24 (talk) 20:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

@George Ho: This article in The Telegraph mentions a lot of countries, with links to articles on specific ones. You should be able to find one or two that you think suit the article well. Darkfrog24 (talk) 20:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

I added another BBC article and The Telegraph, just in case. --George Ho (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Preferred when possible would be to cite Wikinews articles (via Related news). --Pi zero (talk) 13:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Title

I don't know how to accurately summarize the article in the headline. Current headline says, "Taiwan's Constitutional Court legalizes gay marriage and gives legislators two years to amend marriage laws." What about other alternative titles:

• "Taiwan's Constitutional Court finds laws restricting gay marriage unconstitutional"
• "Taiwan's Constitutional Court finds laws restricting gay marriage unconstitutional and gives legislators two years to amend marriage laws"
• "Taiwan's Constitutional Court recognizes gay marriage and gives legislators two years to amend marriage laws"
• "Taiwan's Constitutional Court allows gay marriage and gives legislators two years to amend marriage laws"

Thoughts? --George Ho (talk) 05:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4317323 [Passed]

Revision 4317323 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4317323 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.