Just a note to the reviewer, background information (such as Charles Bolden's spaceflight history) was retrieved from Wikipedia. Tyrol5 (talk) 20:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Sources questionEdit
What's the purpose of the Spaceflight Now live update and the STS-134 page on nasa.gov they don't seem to serve any purpose? --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 16:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1232533 [Failed]Edit
Revision 1232533 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1232533 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
How would you like me to cite the background info (it's undisputed that Bolden flew in space four times, etc.). And the live updates/nasa.gov page were used for mission information (i.e. payloads, objectives, in-flight events). Thanks, Tyrol5 (talk) 20:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1233228 [Passed]Edit
Revision 1233228 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Close to stale, but not there yet. Looks like the sourcing issues have been fixed. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1233228 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Close to stale, but not there yet. Looks like the sourcing issues have been fixed. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Embedded videoEdit
Just as a FYI, it would be preferable if lower resolution video is used when embedded in news articles.
Unlike stills, video is sent at full resolution and it is left for the viewer's browser to resize it. So, if we're only going to embed a 150px video, we should scale the video and put the lower-res copy on Commons. --Brian McNeil / talk 14:31, 23 May 2011 (UTC)