Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A few minor details, such as the hatch opening time were obtained from watching NASA TV. Reviewers are welcome to stop by my talk page to ask any questions. Thanks, Tyrol5 (talk) 02:54, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
With no formal claim of broadcast reporting, and no corresponding detailed reporter's notes, I treated this as more-or-less straight synthesis. I did, allowing for the reporter's acknowledgement of an informal broadcast source, do a bit of mildly-afield checking of source articles linked from those supplied, to deal with the three items I wasn't able to verify from the cited sources. These three items were: the month 11M arrived (November), the time of originally scheduled rendezvous, and the five-minutes-ahead-of-schedule. November was easy to find. The scheduled rendezvous took several false tries (including one of mildly lesser reliability that gave a slightly different time), but I did turn it up. The five minutes, though a nice touch, didn't lend itself to the technique.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
With no formal claim of broadcast reporting, and no corresponding detailed reporter's notes, I treated this as more-or-less straight synthesis. I did, allowing for the reporter's acknowledgement of an informal broadcast source, do a bit of mildly-afield checking of source articles linked from those supplied, to deal with the three items I wasn't able to verify from the cited sources. These three items were: the month 11M arrived (November), the time of originally scheduled rendezvous, and the five-minutes-ahead-of-schedule. November was easy to find. The scheduled rendezvous took several false tries (including one of mildly lesser reliability that gave a slightly different time), but I did turn it up. The five minutes, though a nice touch, didn't lend itself to the technique.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
