Talk:Southern California auto maker announces fully-electric sedan

Review

Revision 795695 of this article has been reviewed by brianmc (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: No comments were left by the reviewer The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 795695 of this article has been reviewed by brianmc (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 09:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: No comments were left by the reviewer The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

--Brian McNeil / ^talk 09:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

No links

There are currently no links at all in this article. It shouldn't have been published this way. Cheers, Van der Hoorn (talk) 12:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

NPOV

I am very surprised how this managed to get published in its current form. The article reads like a press release in many places and has NPOV problems. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 14:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I removed the publish tag and replaced it with {{cleanup}}; I am a bit surprised that this article passed its review like this. For instance: ...But Tesla isn't just any sports car maker [...] And their new Model-S is an improvement in every way [...], among others, fail WN:NPOV. ♪Tempo di Valse ♪ 16:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree, this shouldn't have gone out in the form it went out in. --Killing Vector (talk) 20:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Does anyone watch Married with Children? If so, did anyone see the episode where Kelly became a spokesmodel for a car? "The car of tomorrow! The NEWWWWWWWW ALLANTE!" Yeah, it's like reading a serious ad for that kind of car. Mike Halterman (talk) 21:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I've read quite a bit of 'motoring news', and had gone through the sources, in that context this did not seem particularly out of order. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 21:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah I did too but was the author a test driver? Some of it is written as if someone actually took a ride in one of these. So unless that is a yes, I did my best to not remove those parts, but trying to be as NPOV as possible. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 23:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Review 2

Revision 796456 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 796456 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.