Talk:Ship sunk by Indian navy was a fishing boat, says owner
 |
Revision 731581 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 731581 of this article has been reviewed by Tempodivalse (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:04, 26 November 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
the word year
editit is away from the rest of the text. --71.254.106.200 03:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Date
editIt was not published for many hours as "Nov 25". As Brian McNeil would say, "this is reality calling". However, it was not published until Nov 26, 0003 UTC and the date bump occurred at 0143 UTC. Policy on this is far too flexible if it allows for a story to published on one day but with the previous day's date. It's like inserting a story into yesterday's newspaper after the presses already rolled. --SVTCobra 20:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)