Talk:Several dead in Oregon college shootings

Review of revision 3867792 [Not ready]

Revision 3867792 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I failed to find a bunch of stuff in the sources (list below). Some points about this. Could a source have been left off the list? (Reminder, just in case: Wikipedia is inherently not a trust-worthy source.) When an article has a whole lot of sources, it can be very helpful for reviewers if the writer leaves html comments <!-- like this--> embedded in the text saying where in the sources to find particular facts. Things I didn't find in the sources: para 1 (lede): last clause, about whether the shooter took own life. para 2: the only parts I found were "ex-soldier ... seven times" and the last sentence about the nurse (well... she's a nursing student, which I forgot to fix). Didn't verify the first two sentences, nor the stuff in the third sentence before or after the words I've quoted. para 3: I was only able to verify the first two sentences; the third through sixth sentences I couldn't find. Do not quote sources; it doesn't take the curse off copying their words verbatim. The last paragraph does that. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 3867792 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I failed to find a bunch of stuff in the sources (list below). Some points about this. Could a source have been left off the list? (Reminder, just in case: Wikipedia is inherently not a trust-worthy source.) When an article has a whole lot of sources, it can be very helpful for reviewers if the writer leaves html comments <!-- like this--> embedded in the text saying where in the sources to find particular facts. Things I didn't find in the sources: para 1 (lede): last clause, about whether the shooter took own life. para 2: the only parts I found were "ex-soldier ... seven times" and the last sentence about the nurse (well... she's a nursing student, which I forgot to fix). Didn't verify the first two sentences, nor the stuff in the third sentence before or after the words I've quoted. para 3: I was only able to verify the first two sentences; the third through sixth sentences I couldn't find. Do not quote sources; it doesn't take the curse off copying their words verbatim. The last paragraph does that. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

The missing info was in the CNN source which seems to have stripped it out in the intervening time, although I can find second hand sources which copied the original article. I've added another source to backup that he killed himself but I'm not sure if there are too many sources now. Green Giant (talk) 23:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, the possibility that a source had changed occurred to me belatedly, a while after I'd written my review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 23:33, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Review of revision 3869865 [Passed]

Revision 3869865 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 3869865 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.