Talk:Savage on Santorum on Savage
Background notes edit
Background sect includes material previously already reviewed and published from prior articles, cited in the Related news sect. This pertains to the last 2 paragraphs. -- Cirt (talk) 23:20, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Review of revision 1441843 [Not ready] edit
Revision 1441843 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1441843 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:17, 21 March 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- Thanks very much for the review and the helpful suggestions. I'll get on addressing these as best I can. :) -- Cirt (talk) 17:08, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Response to review by Pi zero edit
I've taken several steps to address the review and helpful suggestions by Pi zero (talk · contribs):
- Done. Removed the image (right) displayed initially. It was a video from a vlogger educating viewers on how to say santorum in sign language. See diff
- Done. Copyedited the lede, removing quotations from the lede, instead modified to summary-style text. See diff.
- Done. Replaced video file suggested for removal from review, with side-by-side of the two subjects discussed in the article. See diff.
- Made some other minor copyedits to improve thrust of the first paragraph and overall flow.
- Added a further response from another source. See diff.
Hopefully this is satisfactory to address concerns from the initial review. And thanks again for the helpful suggestions! :) -- Cirt (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Review of revision 1442999 [Passed] edit
Revision 1442999 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1442999 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:06, 21 March 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- Thanks very much! :) -- Cirt (talk) 02:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)