Talk:Ryanair sack, sue pilot over participation in safety documentary

As you might expect background material is lifted heavily from the already-reviewed prior article. As for {{broadcast report}}, I watched Monday's broadcast but have thus-far managed to avoid directly citing the documentary (amongst other reasons, because I didn't produce any detailed notes as I didn't particularly anticipate writing on it). One thing that struck me very strongly, however, was the fact that Goss alone was brave enough not to have his identity concealed. "The other pilots interviewed by Channel 4 chose to remain anonymous, with only Goss identifying himself" is the only sentence which the broadcast is used to verify. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:50, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1971470 [Passed]

Revision 1971470 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I'd have slipped in a word somewhere in the lede to say when this happened, except I was unable to tell from the sources when it happened. One of them mentioned a statement "dated Wednesday", phrasing which suggests maybe it wasn't made public on Wednesday or they might have said that, though one certainly can't rely on it. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1971470 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:24, 16 August 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I'd have slipped in a word somewhere in the lede to say when this happened, except I was unable to tell from the sources when it happened. One of them mentioned a statement "dated Wednesday", phrasing which suggests maybe it wasn't made public on Wednesday or they might have said that, though one certainly can't rely on it. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.