Talk:Russian travel writer Viktor Pinchuk recounts Oceania expedition in Simferopol, Crimea
Link to the source from which the quote is taken (the last phrase at the end of video): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Пинчук_В._В._(Библотека_КФУ).webm (in ru) — Виктор Пинчук (talk) 12:32, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- I should have time to review this one starting this afternoon (UTC). Heavy Water (talk) 04:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Review of revision 4715940 [Not ready]
edit  |
Revision 4715940 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @Виктор Пинчук. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4715940 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 17:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: @Виктор Пинчук. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- Indeed, for a reason unknown to me, the results of this event were not covered on the relevant sites, but the event did take place as it was stated in the announcement.
As evidence, I can provide a video with a recording of the speech of the director of the scientific library: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Кадуха_Н._И._(Библиотека_КФУ).webm
and chairman of the Crimean branch of the Russian Geographical Society, Gennady Samokhin: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Самохин_Г._В._(Библиотека_КФУ).webm
Since this news is claimed to be an "original report", in my opinion, the evidence is sufficient: This article features first-hand journalism by Wikinews members. — Виктор Пинчук (talk) 19:17, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
- "First-hand journalism" here still requires documentation, even from accredited reporters. These videos appear they will be sufficient; thanks for the quick response. --Heavy Water (talk) 20:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Review of revision 4716032 [Passed]
edit  |
Revision 4716032 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Much editing done for conciseness, style, and removing fluffery. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4716032 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Much editing done for conciseness, style, and removing fluffery. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Cancellation of the source from the Russian Geographical Society
edit@SVTCobra: this news was published two weeks after the article was written. In this case, three weeks have passed. Is it "too late"? — Виктор Пинчук (talk) 06:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- That is an entirely different policy; that is Wikinews:Freshness, or when the article can be published, this is Wikinews:Archive. The archival policy requires no substantive changes be made to an article more than 24 hours after its publication, and adding a source is substantial. Heavy Water (talk) 13:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- It's a pity. An important source... — Виктор Пинчук (talk) 15:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)