Talk:Russian scholars call on Medvedev and Putin to defend Bhagavad Gita

Review of revision 1437998 [Not ready]

Revision 1437998 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The focal news event, the letter from scholars, should have two mutually independent sources. The two-source rule serves multiple review criteria, though verifiability is foremost so is the one I've marked on the review template; there's also newsworthiness and copyright, and in general (though not apparently here) neutrality. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1437998 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:14, 17 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The focal news event, the letter from scholars, should have two mutually independent sources. The two-source rule serves multiple review criteria, though verifiability is foremost so is the one I've marked on the review template; there's also newsworthiness and copyright, and in general (though not apparently here) neutrality. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1438173 [Passed]

Revision 1438173 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1438173 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.