Talk:Russia agrees to construct Turkish nuclear reactor

Review of revision 1018521 [Failed]

Revision 1018521 of this article has been reviewed by James Pain (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: All the money amounts need USD or AUD ect to clarify which currency it's refering to. Comments by reviewer: You searched for a picture of a nuclear reactor, perhaps one in construction or a snap of a person involved? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1018521 of this article has been reviewed by James Pain (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:38, 13 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: All the money amounts need USD or AUD ect to clarify which currency it's refering to. Comments by reviewer: You searched for a picture of a nuclear reactor, perhaps one in construction or a snap of a person involved? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Well, the first linked "$" was to w:US Dollar, so I'm guessing they're all US and I've changed it accordingly. Anything else need fixing? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:59, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1018993 [Passed]

Revision 1018993 of this article has been reviewed by James Pain (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Never adding so many sources again The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1018993 of this article has been reviewed by James Pain (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Never adding so many sources again The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.