Talk:Royal Birth: Duchess of Cambridge gives birth to baby girl

Review of revision 3470968 [Not ready]

Revision 3470968 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Things I couldn't find in the sources: William went with her in the car to hospital (seems likely, but that doesn't make it reportable fact). Direct quote "labour is progressing as normal." Direct quotes from Cameron and Clegg. "were said to be present"? Immediately raises the question of who said it. I actually didn't see a statement they were present; I saw a statement they were on the team. The first Guy's job title differs between sources, one of which gives him, perhaps in error, the same job title as the other; might be better to avoid their job titles in reporting it. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 3470968 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:55, 3 May 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Things I couldn't find in the sources: William went with her in the car to hospital (seems likely, but that doesn't make it reportable fact). Direct quote "labour is progressing as normal." Direct quotes from Cameron and Clegg. "were said to be present"? Immediately raises the question of who said it. I actually didn't see a statement they were present; I saw a statement they were on the team. The first Guy's job title differs between sources, one of which gives him, perhaps in error, the same job title as the other; might be better to avoid their job titles in reporting it. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Hey Pi Zero. Thank you for letting me know. When the sources originally went up, the quote, "labour is progressing as normal," was up there; but with all the updates on the birth they must have deleted that.

I've fixed that part up, along with the car part - ABC News article mentions she travelled by car.

The quotes from Cameron and Clegg appear to be gone as well. I replaced these quotes with a current quote from Australian Prime Minister, Tony Abbot sending congratulations, and a pre birth quote from UK Prime Minister that he sent via Twitter. These can be found in the ABC news Source.

The last part, I fixed up too. - ABC says Obstetrician - but I see what you mean by it differs between sources. If you prefer to take the job titles out during review that's understandable.

Thank you. MusicrocksUOW (talk) 06:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, the msm sites have this bad habit of changing their articles after publication by removing stuff, which often causes problems for us because stuff that was there when a synthesis article was written has disappeared when it's reviewed. Wikinewsies generally don't approve; besides the nuisance value for us, it seems kind of disrespectful to the historical record —feels like erasing history— and... why exactly do they feel motivated to do this? Are they trying to conserve real-estate on the printed page or something? When we update a published article it's pretty much always additive; cf. this. --Pi zero (talk) 14:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Review of revision 3472095 [Passed]

Revision 3472095 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 3472095 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:24, 3 May 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.