Talk:Report indicates Mexican monarch butterfly population at ten-year high, reasons unclear

Headline

I like the new title. Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! It took much chewing over before I came up with it. Tough, to capture the focal event neatly while keeping the bid for an interesting headline. BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 23:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Busterflies

Articles about butterflies, besides this one:

• "Monarch butterfly population down by as much as 60%" — Wikinews, March 31, 2010
• "Scientists discover 11 new species of life in Vietnam" — Wikinews, September 27, 2007
• "Fast evolution observed in butterflies" — Wikinews, July 14, 2007
• "Of cabbages and things: Dutch researchers study wasp hyperparasitoid" — Wikinews, November 29, 2012

--Pi zero (talk) 23:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

I was wondering earlier about a butterfly category, or if we should roll it up into butterflies and moths (lepidoptera). BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 23:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Concur. But I must add sometimes category names can be counterintuitive. I realize they're meant for readers, but maybe a single-screen searchable list with no dropdowns or clickins would be helpful. It'd certainly be more efficient than guess-and-check. Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Neither Special:Categories nor Special:CategoryTree are great, but they may help. The main way to find cats would be via redirects but not all cats are readily found that way, of course... BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 23:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

The only moth articles I see are

• "Caterpillars force temporary closure of Wisconsin state park" — Wikinews, June 19, 2007
• "Japanese researchers create smell sensor using genetically engineered frog eggs" — Wikinews, August 29, 2010

--Pi zero (talk) 23:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Plus a linkable, but not categorisable, mention in Biologist Nick Bos tells Wikinews about 'self-medicating' ants BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 23:56, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, I want to be able to go CTRL-F "endang" and find out if it's "Endangered species" or "Species endangerment" and find out while I'm there that "Endangered Species Act" is a category as well even though I hadn't thought to check. Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

<nods> Categorization is something we'd like to provide semi-automated assistance on; though we also want to arrangement things, consistently, such that semi-automation can feasibly be done without at need. --Pi zero (talk) 02:40, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Review of revision 4461726 [Passed]

Revision 4461726 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4461726 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:24, 2 February 2019 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.