Talk:Publisher withdraws book about Nelson Mandela's final days after family complaint

Review of revision 4333658 [Passed]

Revision 4333658 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:59, 27 July 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There were a number of passages that needed to be further from source; the reporter needs to work on this. A number of facts here I did not find in the sources at all, including some direct quotes; I suspect a source may have been left off the list. If I'd been able to review this much earlier I'd have simply not-ready'd, but there is really no time left on the clock now, so I have choose between cutting ruthlessly to salvage what remains, or not-ready'ing with awareness it would pass the far horizon of its freshness window before anything could be done. It would have been good to say what the publisher said about why they were withdrawing it. This is about as far as I could go without disqualifying myself; and if I went this far on a regular basis I feel I'd need to tighten my criteria further. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4333658 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:59, 27 July 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There were a number of passages that needed to be further from source; the reporter needs to work on this. A number of facts here I did not find in the sources at all, including some direct quotes; I suspect a source may have been left off the list. If I'd been able to review this much earlier I'd have simply not-ready'd, but there is really no time left on the clock now, so I have choose between cutting ruthlessly to salvage what remains, or not-ready'ing with awareness it would pass the far horizon of its freshness window before anything could be done. It would have been good to say what the publisher said about why they were withdrawing it. This is about as far as I could go without disqualifying myself; and if I went this far on a regular basis I feel I'd need to tighten my criteria further. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.