Talk:Protesters against police violence surround London's Scotland Yard
RE: Original Reportage: I was on the protest, taking photographs which are linked to, and gathering information. Some notes and recordings were taken. I also gained information from the police forward intelligence (see the part about CO11) by requesting a form 5454 from them. I can email these to whomever would be able to verify. Jules.--Juleshs31 (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Original Reporting
editsorry i will be unable to upload the or evidence until sun at the latest, due to a technical problem on my end. apologies --Juleshs31 (talk) 18:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- When you are able to upload or send the information, send it to scoop@wikinewsie.org Any of our active accredited reporters will receive the e-mail. In the mean time, I think this can be reviewed. I will do so unless anyone has objections. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 22:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- My key objection is that this was borderline {{stale}} when it was started. It's now a full week past the actual event. If it isn't published sometime tomorrow - with OR notes here and/or emailed to scoop (esp unnamed source stuff) then it should probably be labelled stale. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:45, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have sent OR evidence to the scoop email for review::: --Juleshs31 (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- The OR notes haven't turned up for me at scoop. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Just to add to that, if you've email from what appears in the article as an "Unnamed source" please highlight this if sent as an OR note - we don't want anyone blowing your source's cover accidentally. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- I got them. I forwarded them to you brian. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 15:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- I have sent OR evidence to the scoop email for review::: --Juleshs31 (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Timeliness
editI find it difficult to publish an article on an event that took place so long ago. Even if we stretch our limits to include original reporting, this seems stale as it is from May 23, and per above, we still don't have the notes. --SVTCobra 00:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- RE: Stale, information re:arrests from source found through OR only thurs, day article was written. Ah, sorry upon rereading you have taken that into account. I have added fresh information regarding the pressure groups upcoming action just now as well as a new development in union affiliation--Juleshs31 (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Review
edit
Revision 826083 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 826083 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |