Talk:Plans set in motion for the removal of Bob Barr as the Libertarian Party's U.S. presidential nominee
Review 1
edit
Revision 691669 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Once again, good with it aside from sources. TUFKAAP (talk) 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 691669 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Once again, good with it aside from sources. TUFKAAP (talk) 02:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
PS: The title is copyvio in my book at least. It's a near word-for-word copy of the source and the only one LP has been replaced with "Libertarian U.S.". —Calebrw (talk) 02:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, it's changed now, I did notice consider it... but that's what development's for.
Source/title fixed
editI've renamed the article and found a new source. I've put this back under 'Review'. --WNewsReporter (talk) 02:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- New source added regarding the motion. --WNewsReporter (talk) 03:14, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Would it be possible to you to incorporate part of the motion into the article? That's what seems to be missing, if you add that, I would pass the article for peer review. PS: I will add a related news headers. —Calebrw (talk) 03:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Motion added. --WNewsReporter (talk) 03:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Would it be possible to you to incorporate part of the motion into the article? That's what seems to be missing, if you add that, I would pass the article for peer review. PS: I will add a related news headers. —Calebrw (talk) 03:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
REMOVAL MOTION
editI think it really breaks up the article when it's in the middle. Maybe add it on the bottom after the full text of the article? Or maybe have a link to a separate page? --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 03:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Moved. —Calebrw (talk) 03:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 03:45, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Review 2
edit
Revision 691744 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Great additions since the last review. I like the fact that the whole motion is posted. The mostion could be placed at the end, but that's the only thing I could think to change. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 691744 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Great additions since the last review. I like the fact that the whole motion is posted. The mostion could be placed at the end, but that's the only thing I could think to change. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- Thanks for the review and help. --WNewsReporter (talk) 03:48, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Heads up
editThis, in response to an e-mail Phillies says he received from LP spokesman Andrew Davis saying there is “no truth” to the claims made in a WikiNews article about the possibility of Barr’s removal.
- "Libertarian Party spokesman: ‘Barr will not be removed’" — Austin Cassidy's Independent Political Report, September 16, 2008
Cirt (talk) 22:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Everything in that article was sourced. I'm pretty sure that Davis was lying to save face. --WNewsReporter (talk) 22:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)