Talk:People from Pichilemu, Chile leave La Cruz Hill
I'm an eyewitness to the dispute that took place in La Cruz Hill and that made the people to leave it. Every single word of it. I can't find sources but I'm sure I'll can find a link to a Canal 13 video later. --MisterWiki (talk) 04:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 978972 [Failed]
edit  |
Revision 978972 of this article has been reviewed by PSD27 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Again, your article looks good, but you have too many Spanish sources and only one small English one. That makes it hard to verify your content. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 978972 of this article has been reviewed by PSD27 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Again, your article looks good, but you have too many Spanish sources and only one small English one. That makes it hard to verify your content. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- How can I find English language sources if they all talk about the new president or the new aftershocks. 4 hours looking for some sources and no, there aren't more. --MisterWiki (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- There is nothing wrong with not using English sources. We frequently publish articles that contain only foreign-language sources. There are a few people here who speak decent Spanish, we could have waited for them to review, or else used Google Translate (difference between Spanish and English is not very great and a translator can bridge most of the gap). Tempodivalse [talk] 00:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I tried to explain him that. [Google doesn't translate videos ;-)] --MisterWiki (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- There is nothing wrong with not using English sources. We frequently publish articles that contain only foreign-language sources. There are a few people here who speak decent Spanish, we could have waited for them to review, or else used Google Translate (difference between Spanish and English is not very great and a translator can bridge most of the gap). Tempodivalse [talk] 00:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 979228 [Passed]
edit  |
Revision 979228 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 979228 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Edit protected request
edit{{editprotected}}Please add Category:O'Higgins Region and Category:2010 Pichilemu earthquake. Thanks. --Diego Grez return fire 20:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Request
edit{{editprotected}} Wikilink La Cruz Hill > w:La Cruz Hill --Diego Grez return fire 17:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- Let's think this through. Is there some reason to think the en.WP article can survive a challenge for non-notability? We don't want to add links that will eventually become broken links. --Pi zero (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is notable. It became notable in Chilean news media after the March 11 earthquake, and it is one of the most important points/attractions of Pichilemu. The WP article is currently an stub, but it could be expanded. --Diego Grez return fire 20:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, having raised the issue I'll defer to your judgment. (I've also added it to my WP watchlist, though, just in case. :-) --Pi zero (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Done --Pi zero (talk) 21:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks :-) --Diego Grez return fire 21:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is notable. It became notable in Chilean news media after the March 11 earthquake, and it is one of the most important points/attractions of Pichilemu. The WP article is currently an stub, but it could be expanded. --Diego Grez return fire 20:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)