Talk:On the campaign trail, February 2012

Summary

• Barr - [1]
• Goode - Former Congressman Virgil Goode enters race for Constitution Party presidential nomination
• Roemer - Buddy Roemer ends Republican presidential bid to seek Reform Party nomination
• Trump endorsement - [2]
• Nevada caucus - Mitt Romney wins 2012 Nevada caucuses
• Santorum sweep - Rick Santorum sweeps three non-binding GOP presidential contests
• Romney wins Maine - [3]
• Opinion polls - [4]
• DeWine endorsement - [5]
• New candidate - [6]
• Social issues - [7]
• Separation of church and state - [8]
• Debate - [9]
• Santorum robo-calls - [10]
• Romney wins Arizona and Michigan - [11]
• Gingrich Super Tuesday - [12]
• Paul second in Maine - [13]
• Paul-Romney alliance - [14]

Missouri Libertarian Party primary results

• Results - [15]
• 2008 "uncommitted" plurality - [16]
• Ogle background - [17]
• Filing fee/other candidates - [18]
• Quotes - scoop
• Missourian article - [19]
• Other LP primaries - [20] (See Comment 4 from Ballot Access expert Richard Winger)

Republican focuses on Iran

• Cort background - [21]
• Quotes - scoop
• New Hampshire primary votes - Mitt Romney wins the 2012 New Hampshire Republican primary
• IAEA inspectors/ Strait of Hormuz threat - [22]
• War possibility - [23]
• Cort book - [24]

More than one-dimensional?

• Opening - scoop
• Second place in Missouri - [25]
• Second place overall - [26]
• Advertisements - [27]
• Ann Coulter - [28]
• Quotes - scoop
• Islamic terrorism papers - [29]
• Music - [30]

Review of revision 1423739 [Passed]

Revision 1423739 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Presenting the Paul-Romney rumors while omitting the denial came across as non-neutral; remedy was sufficiently simple and straightforward to implement. Comments about articles generally wouldn't be trust-worthy sources, due to lack of verification of claimed authorship of comments. (Winger's trust-worthiness doesn't come into it.) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1423739 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Presenting the Paul-Romney rumors while omitting the denial came across as non-neutral; remedy was sufficiently simple and straightforward to implement. Comments about articles generally wouldn't be trust-worthy sources, due to lack of verification of claimed authorship of comments. (Winger's trust-worthiness doesn't come into it.) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.