Talk:Officer dies in Glasgow police station shooting incident

Review of revision 1686285 [Passed]

Revision 1686285 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1686285 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:46, 6 November 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Rename

Rename to something like "Officer dies in Glasgow police station firearms incident", it is most likely that this is either a case of suicide or an accidental discharge of a firearm, the use of the word "shooting" suggests a second party.--KTo288 (talk) 14:48, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Interesting point. Will consider options. --Pi zero (talk) 15:53, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Yes, interesting. A shooting could also mean an accidental or self-inflicted shooting. The sources for this article have both described it in their headlines as a "shooting" CalF (talk) 15:56, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

I've appended the word "incident" to the headline. Should mitigate potential for misimpression. --Pi zero (talk)