Talk:NuCaptcha introduces a video captcha service, ads included

Review of revision 1122876 [Failed]

Revision 1122876 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: This article is subtly biased in that it states as fact the idea that this new version is easier to recognise - this is actually subjective. These statements should be attributed to someone; e.g. 'Researchers at the University of Nowhere say it is easier for the brain to comprehend because...' 'NuCaptha claims this process will be easier to understand'. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1122876 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: This article is subtly biased in that it states as fact the idea that this new version is easier to recognise - this is actually subjective. These statements should be attributed to someone; e.g. 'Researchers at the University of Nowhere say it is easier for the brain to comprehend because...' 'NuCaptha claims this process will be easier to understand'. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Comment

This is dangerously close to a press-release. Cheers, --SVTCobra 00:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1123142 [Passed]

Revision 1123142 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I very seriously considered a review fail owing to the length of time that has passed. I narrowly decided in favour of publish since it is on the outside edge of acceptable and has received little attention in the mainstream press, at least that I know of. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1123142 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I very seriously considered a review fail owing to the length of time that has passed. I narrowly decided in favour of publish since it is on the outside edge of acceptable and has received little attention in the mainstream press, at least that I know of. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Comment 2

This article advertises and doesn't even say what it would take from a browser to support it (by this, it probably wouldn't be bad). Also, NoScript is not an anti-advertising tool, it's more like some ads are anti-security. --AVRS (talk) 10:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)