Talk:North Korea launches long-range missile

Review of revision 4190537 [Passed]

Revision 4190537 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: You need to work on distance-from-source. It's not enough to change a word here and there; things should be said in a completely different way (same information, original presentation). I do what I can as reviewer, but I'm limited in how much I can do because if I do too much I'd have to disqualify myself from publishing the article on grounds I'm no longer uninvolved in the writing of the article. It's good to find a way to say things that completely rearranges the ordering of major elements of what is being said (nouns and verbs), and especially good to arrange things so that a single sentence/clause of our article contains information drawn from different sources or different parts of a single source, while information from a single part of a single source can get distributed across distant points in our article. Btw, do please use the {{w}} template for wikilinks. It's an important tool on Wikinews. We have a policy that wikilinks should be local when there is a local target available, and that's one of the several important things {{w}} does for us: it links locally if there is a local target, only linking to Wikipedia if there's no local target available. It also helps us with categorizing articles; for example, those categories I added to the article were mostly suggested to me by the {{w}} template (there's a gadget to help with that). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4190537 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: You need to work on distance-from-source. It's not enough to change a word here and there; things should be said in a completely different way (same information, original presentation). I do what I can as reviewer, but I'm limited in how much I can do because if I do too much I'd have to disqualify myself from publishing the article on grounds I'm no longer uninvolved in the writing of the article. It's good to find a way to say things that completely rearranges the ordering of major elements of what is being said (nouns and verbs), and especially good to arrange things so that a single sentence/clause of our article contains information drawn from different sources or different parts of a single source, while information from a single part of a single source can get distributed across distant points in our article. Btw, do please use the {{w}} template for wikilinks. It's an important tool on Wikinews. We have a policy that wikilinks should be local when there is a local target available, and that's one of the several important things {{w}} does for us: it links locally if there is a local target, only linking to Wikipedia if there's no local target available. It also helps us with categorizing articles; for example, those categories I added to the article were mostly suggested to me by the {{w}} template (there's a gadget to help with that). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.