Talk:News International offers £3 million phone-hacking settlement to family of murder victim

Review of revision 1290620 [Passed]

Revision 1290620 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: You shouldn't be copying passages from the sources and then 'scuffing them up' to make them different from the sources. That doesn't keep it from being copyvio, and you also need to understand the story in more depth than that encourages. For really good synthesis, you want to create your own presentation of the material (even though the information is all from the sources), with your own ordering of ideas; selecting, from the source material, those ideas most important and most helpful to your presentation; using your own words, phrases, and sentence structure. It should (if this isn't too much of a stretch) mostly feel like you're putting in your own manner of presentation, rather than 'scuffing up' stuff taken from the sources. As a reviewer, I've considered carefully whether I've got too involved to publish. I think I'm right on the very edge. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1290620 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: You shouldn't be copying passages from the sources and then 'scuffing them up' to make them different from the sources. That doesn't keep it from being copyvio, and you also need to understand the story in more depth than that encourages. For really good synthesis, you want to create your own presentation of the material (even though the information is all from the sources), with your own ordering of ideas; selecting, from the source material, those ideas most important and most helpful to your presentation; using your own words, phrases, and sentence structure. It should (if this isn't too much of a stretch) mostly feel like you're putting in your own manner of presentation, rather than 'scuffing up' stuff taken from the sources. As a reviewer, I've considered carefully whether I've got too involved to publish. I think I'm right on the very edge. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.