Talk:New Polish government takes down findings on Russian air disaster

Courtesy note

The following articles were drawn upon;

• Polish President Lech Kaczyński dies as his plane crashes in Russia
• Bronislaw Komorowski sworn in as president of Poland
• 'Unacceptable' and 'without foundation': Poland rejects Russian air crash report
• Investigation into Polish air crash reveals passengers in cockpit
  

BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 19:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Double sourcing

Two of the sources are almost identical. I had both in front of me and they are slightly different; I'm unable to be 100% sure they do not both contribute. A cautious reviewer may be able to remove one as redundant, possibly by attempting to verify from just one and then removing the other if verification is successful. BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

I used only one and have removed the other. I actually haven't verified quite everything, yet, but what remains seems to be a Related news detail. --Pi zero (talk) 03:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Review of revision 4007644 [Passed]

Revision 4007644 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Unusually, the new-information-come-to-light clause applies, with comments on Tuesday and Wednesday although the sources don't pin down just when the focal event took place. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4007644 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:06, 26 November 2015 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Unusually, the new-information-come-to-light clause applies, with comments on Tuesday and Wednesday although the sources don't pin down just when the focal event took place. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.