Talk:Needle found in sandwich on Air Canada flight

Review of revision 1572254 [Not ready]

Revision 1572254 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Minimal length for a standalone article is 'about three medium-sized paragraphs'; don't think this quite meets that criterion. The Headline doesn't describe the focal news event of this article; it should tell the most important and unique thing about the focal news event. Five sources are listed. That's a lot of sources for a reviewer to read, for such a short article; are they all used? We do have a policy that unused sources should not be listed. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1572254 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:18, 1 August 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Minimal length for a standalone article is 'about three medium-sized paragraphs'; don't think this quite meets that criterion. The Headline doesn't describe the focal news event of this article; it should tell the most important and unique thing about the focal news event. Five sources are listed. That's a lot of sources for a reviewer to read, for such a short article; are they all used? We do have a policy that unused sources should not be listed. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1572473 [Passed]

Revision 1572473 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: After removal of redundant/unverified material, this is back to being very marginal in length (even with the extra bit added after the first review); I could see calling it on either side of the line. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1572473 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:41, 2 August 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: After removal of redundant/unverified material, this is back to being very marginal in length (even with the extra bit added after the first review); I could see calling it on either side of the line. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.