Talk:Nearly 25% of Iceland's voters petition for veto of Icesave bill

The figures for this are a complete mess; the France 24 source quotes $5 billion, the BBC quotes € and £ figures as the same amount.

The video clip mentions minimum repayment/compensation amounts under european laws for depositor guarantees but no details of these are present.

A criticism of the related news story on NewsTrust was that it did not give context/background for those truly ignorant of the Icesave issue - which affects more than the one failed bank. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 12:17, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Worked together with Brian (thanks for the additional info you added) to address issues. The figures error was sloppy. --Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 15:09, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 931636 [Failed]

Revision 931636 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: figues do not match sources but sources are inconsistent and, in BBC's case, plain wrong (quoting € and £ as at-parity) NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: See earlier comments above. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 931636 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: figues do not match sources but sources are inconsistent and, in BBC's case, plain wrong (quoting € and £ as at-parity) NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: See earlier comments above. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 931709 [Passed]

Revision 931709 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I took out a couple of little bits I couldn't find in the sources, I hope I didn't simply miss them. They look quite easy to source and re-add. I'd have liked to see the 56,000 figure in there somewhere. Otherwise, very good work. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 931709 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I took out a couple of little bits I couldn't find in the sources, I hope I didn't simply miss them. They look quite easy to source and re-add. I'd have liked to see the 56,000 figure in there somewhere. Otherwise, very good work. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

• The bit you took out was sort-of paraphrase from Magnus' comments in the video clip on the BBC article. He gave a month, I was quickly able to track down the previous deal and a couple of points from it. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 16:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

• Ah, ok. I didn't watch the actual clip, I don't presently have headphones plugged into my laptop. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)