Talk:Medical helicopter crashes in Tucson, Arizona, kills all on board

Merge?

I see the original author(s) have not finished this article. Would it be appropriate to merge it with C-17 Crashes near Air Force Base in Alaska? --InfantGorilla (talk) 15:37, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Not done The C-17 article is finished, and this is now considerably longer than it was when I suggested the review. --InfantGorilla (talk) 06:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Research resource

Slides about emergency response helicopter accident hearings and recommendations:

• http://www.ntsb.gov/Speeches/sumwalt/AAMS-update-March-2010.pdf

--InfantGorilla (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1068021 [Failed]

Revision 1068021 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not ready: "a specialist in emergency medical helicopters"? That's barely relevant and sounds almost like an ad. Style: Not ready: It's just too short. It technically meets the criteria, but it leaps from "Eyewitness Ricardo Carrasco said the helicopter's rotors stopped working and it started plummeting toward the ground" to "Two other fatal aviation accidents..." without any further discussion of the first incident. Comments by reviewer: Sorry, but there's not enough detail to publish here- it leaves the reader thinking "And....". It doesn't feel "finished" to me. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1068021 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Not ready: "a specialist in emergency medical helicopters"? That's barely relevant and sounds almost like an ad. Style: Not ready: It's just too short. It technically meets the criteria, but it leaps from "Eyewitness Ricardo Carrasco said the helicopter's rotors stopped working and it started plummeting toward the ground" to "Two other fatal aviation accidents..." without any further discussion of the first incident. Comments by reviewer: Sorry, but there's not enough detail to publish here- it leaves the reader thinking "And....". It doesn't feel "finished" to me. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Bias?

How do we describe Air Methods Corporation? All it does is fly EMS helicopters, dozens of them, so I picked the word 'specialist'. I don't think we are saying whether it is good at it or not, but I think we can't just mention the name of a company that nobody has heard of without describing it. --InfantGorilla (talk) 05:03, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1068990 [Passed]

Revision 1068990 of this article has been reviewed by The wub (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good to go The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1068990 of this article has been reviewed by The wub (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:50, 30 July 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Looks good to go The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.