Review of revision 1791944 [Not ready]Edit
Revision 1791944 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1791944 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:49, 30 January 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1792638 [Not ready]Edit
Revision 1792638 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1792638 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
The thing is that the Minor Planet Circulars are now published with a lag. So the information about the naming became available only yesterday (January 30) in the evening. You can see that the lists were updated on Jan 30:
Already circulatingEdit
This link's already going around the Twittersphere, a cleaned-up version with detail ASAP would be a good thing - chance to be the breaking news source. Commentary from WMF? - David Gerard (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'd heard something (via IRC) about the link being spread around. It's clearly labeled as not having passed review, so readers are not uninformed thereof. I'm working on it; I can't work faster than as fast as I can, which is how fast I work anyway. --Pi zero (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
- But of course :-) - David Gerard (talk) 20:33, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Review of revision 1793205 [Passed]Edit
Revision 1793205 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1793205 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |