Talk:Magnitude 7.3 earthquake off Fukushima, Japan causes about 50 injuries

Headline

I note the headline needs revision before publication, because it's not nearly unique enough. Just imagine, ten years from now, finding this headline in the archives; to what does it refer? --Pi zero (talk) 01:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Having said that, idk what to do with it either. --Pi zero (talk) 01:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Added reference to Fukushima. --Pi zero (talk) 03:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Review of revision 4605805 [Passed]

Revision 4605805 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Face the past in news reportage; we only know the past, not the future and mostly not even the present. Moreover, disaster coverage like this, where available information may rapidly change, especially needs great clarity on as-of-when information was presented. Attribution to news sources may be especially common in this sort of reportage. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4605805 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Face the past in news reportage; we only know the past, not the future and mostly not even the present. Moreover, disaster coverage like this, where available information may rapidly change, especially needs great clarity on as-of-when information was presented. Attribution to news sources may be especially common in this sort of reportage. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

One thing I ought to have done differently: I ought to have published this as {{breaking}}, because it is reasonable to expect we might wish to significantly update it during the 24-hour grace period after publication. --Pi zero (talk) 14:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)