Talk:Lost Antarctic shipwreck from 1915 Shackleton expedition, Endurance, rediscovered

Review of revision 4665613 [Not ready]

Revision 4665613 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 08:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Two independent sources needed. Press release not independent. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4665613 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 08:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Two independent sources needed. Press release not independent. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4665686 [Passed]

Revision 4665686 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Recognise we are not writing the romantic story perhaps NPR or BBC were seeking. We establish what happened, and its significance. We do not dwell into sentimentalities. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4665686 of this article has been reviewed by JJLiu112 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:33, 10 March 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Recognise we are not writing the romantic story perhaps NPR or BBC were seeking. We establish what happened, and its significance. We do not dwell into sentimentalities. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.