Any hard medical opinions about what could have caused 400 kids to be infected?

edit

Back to article

 

This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.

Quick hints for new commentators:

  • Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
  • Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
  • You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading

It seems that the infection of 400 children with aids is a difficult feat to achieve by any means except deliberate ones. I would think that an article would try to get some expert opinions as to how 400 children could be infected through unsanitary conditions, and whether that was likely. While the article does not exonerate the doctors, it implies their innocence by quoting those applauding their freedom. Peotre 02:58, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

That a very good observation, one that I am also interested in finding out. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 03:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Based on what little background I have read, there seems to be little to no evidence against them. There was a large unexplained outbreak, so the authorities blamed the staff. --SVTCobra 11:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply