Talk:Karen Handel wins runoff for seat in United States House of Representatives

Notes from reporter

1) I'm not married to the title and have no objection to its being changed. 2) I realize breaking news isn't always our thing, but Georgia is notoriously slow to count its votes. It is entirely possible that we will be able to publish this before the results are known. I know I can always just update it, but it seems worth a shot. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Well, the title needs to change, as it's a noun phrase. I'm thinking on that. --Pi zero (talk) 21:53, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Renamed. --Pi zero (talk) 22:05, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

As you say, we can update it if necessary; I'll see what I can do. --Pi zero (talk) 23:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Awesome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 23:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4324769 [Not ready]

Revision 4324769 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The third paragraph here, as currently written, is mostly analysis. Although the second sentence is well grounded in attribution, the first is uncomfortably vague ("many experts"), and the third is clearly analysis in Wikinews's own voice ("It may also tell [...]"). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4324769 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The third paragraph here, as currently written, is mostly analysis. Although the second sentence is well grounded in attribution, the first is uncomfortably vague ("many experts"), and the third is clearly analysis in Wikinews's own voice ("It may also tell [...]"). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Quotes

This article contains a quote from the loser's concession speech and not from the winner's acceptance speech because his quotes were available and hers weren't. No objection to anyone adding a quote from Handel if you can find one. Darkfrog24 (talk) 17:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4325511 [Passed]

Revision 4325511 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4325511 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.