Talk:Judge rules Air Canada Flight 624 victims can sue Transport Canada
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Pi zero in topic Review of revision 4269917 [Passed]
NavCanada
editThe NavCanada source verifies only a few words, which (as you'd expect) is exactly who they actually are. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 17:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
- The planespotting database is only to confirm the airframe was destroyed. The source shortly after the crash verifies the stuff about the offer of money, what Wagner said at the time, and the unexplained power failure. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 17:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Review of revision 4269917 [Passed]
edit
Revision 4269917 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4269917 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |