Talk:Judge declares mistrial in Bill Cosby sexual assault case

When

did​ the focal point of this story happen?
acagastya 03:25, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

@Acagastya: The new focal point, the declaration of a mistrial by the judge, was yesterday morning, Saturday. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

QuoteLeft

The author parameter should be prefixed with 4=. (Didn't want to do this quick fix with {{under review}} on the article, lest it cause an edit conflict.) --Pi zero (talk) 02:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Fixed.--KTo288 (talk) 03:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4324427 [Not ready]

Revision 4324427 of this article has been reviewed by KTo288 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Would publish if I hadn't rewritten sentences with regard to charges (3 charges of aggravated indecent assault each of which was liable for a sentence of up to 10 years), testimony of victims of cases which did not go to trial, as it was too close to that which appeared in the Guardian article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4324427 of this article has been reviewed by KTo288 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Would publish if I hadn't rewritten sentences with regard to charges (3 charges of aggravated indecent assault each of which was liable for a sentence of up to 10 years), testimony of victims of cases which did not go to trial, as it was too close to that which appeared in the Guardian article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4324447 [Passed]

Revision 4324447 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I've scrutinized the edits for which the preceding reviewer disqualified. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4324447 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I've scrutinized the edits for which the preceding reviewer disqualified. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.