Talk:Jenson Button wins 2009 Australian Grand Prix, Brawn teammate comes second
Review
edit
Revision 795138 of this article has been reviewed by Amgine (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The verification for everything except the final sentence: "Button, BrawnGP and his team are now leading the championship for the first time in their team's history." Probably true, and might be in the sources, I just didn't see it. Amgine Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 795138 of this article has been reviewed by Amgine (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The verification for everything except the final sentence: "Button, BrawnGP and his team are now leading the championship for the first time in their team's history." Probably true, and might be in the sources, I just didn't see it. Amgine Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- It was the first time the team had ever raced and the first race of the season, therefore they collected their first ever points and as they came both first and second go to the top of the constructors championship table for the first time ([1]). It was also the first time since 1970 that a new team has started from pole position in it's first race ([2]), the first time since 1977 that a new team had won it's first race and the first time since 1954 that a new team has finished 1st and 2nd in it's first race (both from [3]). Nanonic (talk) 22:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Excellent! Add the last two citations to the sources list and drop me a ping and I'll be happy to update my review and publish. - Amgine | t 04:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Review revision 796057
edit
Revision 796057 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: the related news is considered a source. --SVTCobra 23:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 796057 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: the related news is considered a source. --SVTCobra 23:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |