Talk:Japan earthquake death toll estimated at over 10,000

Review of revision 1194736 [Failed]

Revision 1194736 of this article has been reviewed by Ashershow1 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The first cited source says "Some 350,000 people have reportedly been left homeless and are staying in shelters..." while this article says "Some 350,000 people have been left homeless; shelters are housing these people at the moment." That seems too close for comfort. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1194736 of this article has been reviewed by Ashershow1 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The first cited source says "Some 350,000 people have reportedly been left homeless and are staying in shelters..." while this article says "Some 350,000 people have been left homeless; shelters are housing these people at the moment." That seems too close for comfort. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1194847 [Failed]

Revision 1194847 of this article has been reviewed by Ashershow1 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The authors of the sources are not listed. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1194847 of this article has been reviewed by Ashershow1 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The authors of the sources are not listed. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

That's not really necessary. As far as the sources are trustworthy... Diego Grez ^{return fire} 23:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Ah, good to know :) --Ashershow1_talk 00:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

The author parameter is somewhat optional. A lot of sources don't even list authors. In any case, this is a minor thing, if that's the only problem with an article you should just correct it yourself and publish it. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Agreed it's minor enough that fixing it leaves a peer reviewer uninvolved.

But I don't really agree it's optional — it's a matter of giving credit where due to someone who probably writes for a living. A commonly make mistake, yes. --Pi zero (talk) 00:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1194865 [Passed]

Revision 1194865 of this article has been reviewed by Ashershow1 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1194865 of this article has been reviewed by Ashershow1 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.