Talk:Japan earthquake death toll estimated at over 10,000

Active discussions

Review of revision 1194736 [Failed]Edit

Review of revision 1194847 [Failed]Edit

That's not really necessary. As far as the sources are trustworthy... Diego Grez return fire 23:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Ah, good to know :) --Ashershow1talk 00:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
The author parameter is somewhat optional. A lot of sources don't even list authors. In any case, this is a minor thing, if that's the only problem with an article you should just correct it yourself and publish it. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Agreed it's minor enough that fixing it leaves a peer reviewer uninvolved.
But I don't really agree it's optional — it's a matter of giving credit where due to someone who probably writes for a living. A commonly make mistake, yes. --Pi zero (talk) 00:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1194865 [Passed]Edit

Return to "Japan earthquake death toll estimated at over 10,000" page.