Talk:Italian President Sergio Mattarella re-elected for second term, ending successor row

Review

Hey @Cromium: @LivelyRatification:, if you're free. --JJLiu112 (talk) 20:15, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Aye aye! I was in the midst of reading the sources when you pinged me! 😁 [₂₄Cr][talk] 21:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4659347 [Not ready]

Revision 4659347 of this article has been reviewed by Cromium (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: There is a small amount of quoting the sources directly e.g. the sentence which starts with "Reuters characterised…", which should be rewritten to describe the situation rather than what the journalists say. This is why we list the sources at the end. The other major hurdle to overcome is the length of some of the sentences. No sentence should be so long that a reader has to take a breath reading it. There are different views on how many words there should be but I’d say aim for no more than 25 words. Certainly, 59 words is far too long. I’ve marked most of the ones that need attention. Additionally there are some redundant words such as the sentence that starts "Mattarella was praised for his action in appointing…" The words "his action in" could be removed without affecting the meaning of the sentence. Otherwise it’s a very good article and I enjoyed reading it. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4659347 of this article has been reviewed by Cromium (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:59, 30 January 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Not ready: Comments by reviewer: There is a small amount of quoting the sources directly e.g. the sentence which starts with "Reuters characterised…", which should be rewritten to describe the situation rather than what the journalists say. This is why we list the sources at the end. The other major hurdle to overcome is the length of some of the sentences. No sentence should be so long that a reader has to take a breath reading it. There are different views on how many words there should be but I’d say aim for no more than 25 words. Certainly, 59 words is far too long. I’ve marked most of the ones that need attention. Additionally there are some redundant words such as the sentence that starts "Mattarella was praised for his action in appointing…" The words "his action in" could be removed without affecting the meaning of the sentence. Otherwise it’s a very good article and I enjoyed reading it. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

@Cromium: I aim to maintain NPOV by contextualising anything perceived to be subjective or not plainly supported by attributing a relevant source. That way, readers can ascertain to under what context these comments were made without assuming any bias. I find just because I said "Reuters said ..." is really a non-issue. As for sentence length, I'll trim them. --JJLiu112 (talk) 21:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

To my understanding, this has been resolved without removing the attributions I personally think are vital. I think we can be a bit more lax on the 25-word limit than, say, the government. Nonetheless, the average sentence length has been cut to 20.34 words. Please re-review, when you have time. --JJLiu112 (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4659361 [Passed]

Revision 4659361 of this article has been reviewed by Cromium (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Main issues have been addressed. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4659361 of this article has been reviewed by Cromium (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Main issues have been addressed. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Edit

{{editprotected}}

Add category elections. --JJLiu112 (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Done. [₂₄Cr][talk] 09:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)