Talk:Google Taiwan: Building knowledge sharing center-stage with innovations
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Uncle G in topic OR info
ProblemsEdit
O have several issues with this article-
- Google Page creator has existed for ages
- This seems like advertising
- This is not news
- It sounds like a press release
- It was published early
- All the sources are to Google or Google Pages
The article was written and published in one edit by an anonymous user who was making his first edit yet --User:Anonymous101 (Talk) 11:51, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- ..... Should I try to clean up and re-name b/c this information can be varied and modified after I add information from Taiwan's Press Conference? Brock contact... 15:17, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for improving it. I take away all my complaints but it's style of writing needs a little improvment before publishing. I also question its neuteral point of view --User:Anonymous101 12:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- BTW of the NPOV, I think its title may be shorten and contents can be C/ed twice before publishing. Just wait for experts. Brock contact... 16:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for improving it. I take away all my complaints but it's style of writing needs a little improvment before publishing. I also question its neuteral point of view --User:Anonymous101 12:33, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
The first paragraph needs to be about where, when, and why this event (press conference) took place. I do realize the "when" is in the second paragraph. --SVTCobra 21:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Paragraph and title changed. Brock contact... 08:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
OR infoEdit
I've participated a press conference last Tuesday, Kai-fu Lee said more on the developments of Google in Taiwan, it's differ than other countries. Brock contact... 15:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's still not clear from the article what is actually new here, i.e. what the news is. Uncle G 12:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Needs native speaker C/E and title changeEdit
I can't figure out how to title this one, but there's a spelling error in there so unpublished. --Brian McNeil / talk 21:30, 24 December 2007 (UTC)