Talk:Fox News movie reviewer fired for downloading film
Original research
edit"Depending on the method he used to obtain the film, he may not have infringed copyright at all, just exercised legal fair use exceptions. When you add in the very positive review he gave the film, it makes you wonder why Fox acted as they did. The reason is painfully obvious, to 'send a message'. Alas the only message they send is that they don't care about facts, and let no-one stand in the way of their paranoid witch-hunt" -- Andrew Norton, spokesperson for Pirate Party International (via IRC) --Killing Vector (talk) 22:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Review revision 801526
edit
Revision 801526 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Lesson: don't mess with your employer's livelihood. --SVTCobra 22:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 801526 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Lesson: don't mess with your employer's livelihood. --SVTCobra 22:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Premieres
editThere is a single date given for the premiere, is this US, EU, Worldwide? --Brian McNeil / talk 23:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Good point. I updated for release dates in the major English speaking countries. The source was Wikipedia. --SVTCobra 23:49, 8 April 2009 (UTC)