Talk:Female lawyers to be granted court access in Saudi Arabia

Review of revision 963622 [Passed]

Revision 963622 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 963622 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Changes

I can't say that I like the original, but I can't sight Blurpeace (talk · contribs)'s changes. It completely changes the original sentence and eliminates the mention of "women" and where did "BCC" come from??? --SVTCobra 02:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

I am citing the BCC to relieve bias concerns. I hadn't intentionally removed "women" from the sentence. Situated the mention into the new sentence. Blurpeace 02:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

But what is the BCC??? I have not heard of it and it is not mentioned in the article until your use of BCC. --SVTCobra 03:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Hah, I didn't even notice that. I read it as BBC. Mikemoral has already fixed it though. Gopher65_talk 03:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Gah, I hadn't even noticed the mistake until now. I've been reading it as BBC the entire time. Blurpeace 03:33, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

┌─────────────┘
Yeah I noticed that and it made me think "Huh?" So I fixed it. --Mikemoral♪♫ 03:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)