Talk:Female lawyers to be granted court access in Saudi Arabia
Review of revision 963622 [Passed] edit
Revision 963622 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 963622 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:50, 23 February 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Changes edit
I can't say that I like the original, but I can't sight Blurpeace (talk · contribs)'s changes. It completely changes the original sentence and eliminates the mention of "women" and where did "BCC" come from??? --SVTCobra 02:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- I am citing the BCC to relieve bias concerns. I hadn't intentionally removed "women" from the sentence. Situated the mention into the new sentence. Blurpeace 02:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
┌─────────────┘
Yeah I noticed that and it made me think "Huh?" So I fixed it. --Mikemoral♪♫ 03:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)