Talk:FAA orders review of Boeing 787 Dreamliners following week of incidents

Review of revision 1770272 [Passed]

Revision 1770272 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1770272 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:17, 13 January 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

OR notes

Photo taken by me of plane now added, and JAL route is from Boston to Tokyo's Narita Airport, I should have mentioned that earlier. I know this because outside of my duties here at Wikinews, my regular job is working at Logan Airport. --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 15:14, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Source for the photo that this is the aircraft that suffered the APU fire, tail # is JA829J in photo, plane involved according to link is JA829J. --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 15:22, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Cool. Made it in before the 24-hour archiving horizon after publication. :-)  --Pi zero (talk) 15:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)