Talk:European Council agrees to crypto asset regulations

Review of revision 4728319 [Passed]

Revision 4728319 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There's no such thing as EU president, contrary to what No. 10 thinks. The AP got this right and Reuters...didn't. On a more serious note, I would strongly urge you, @CSJJ104, to look at what I edited here and the final product, to note when writing in the future. Rewriting an active voice source sentence in the passive voice and using synonyms only just substitute one problem for another, especially the first. Also NPOV: you can't just say some events are "high profile" or that caused "the issue of regulating the market to rise in importance" (we also shouldn't assume regulators' thoughts like that), but you can juxtapose facts to allow the reader to conclude that. It would be good to include a sentence or two, sourced from the article in Related news, about the digital euro. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4728319 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: There's no such thing as EU president, contrary to what No. 10 thinks. The AP got this right and Reuters...didn't. On a more serious note, I would strongly urge you, @CSJJ104, to look at what I edited here and the final product, to note when writing in the future. Rewriting an active voice source sentence in the passive voice and using synonyms only just substitute one problem for another, especially the first. Also NPOV: you can't just say some events are "high profile" or that caused "the issue of regulating the market to rise in importance" (we also shouldn't assume regulators' thoughts like that), but you can juxtapose facts to allow the reader to conclude that. It would be good to include a sentence or two, sourced from the article in Related news, about the digital euro. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

@Heavy Water: - Thanks for the review :) Can I ask about this change? Is the WN:TENSE issue related to me saying the process had ended, or am I misunderstanding? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CSJJ104 (talk • contribs)

You're welcome. It was "ends a legislative process", yeah. Also, I just thought it would be good to eliminate the "expected" (who expects?), so I used set. Heavy Water (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)