Talk:Emergency directive for Sikorsky S-92A helicopters
Revision 788615 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 788615 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Sources
editThe top article source now can be quoted if needed..."The finding has prompted the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to ground all Sikorsky S92-A helicopters until the appropriate repair is made. "[1] However, many articles for March 20, 2009 which have subsequently come out says as tis said above in PR that the FAA will issue....so I will change it to the catch above...thank you... another source, there are quite a few around and about right now which also say FAA is expected to........
- Jorge Barrera and Linda Nguyen. "Broken stud found on N.L. crashed helicopter" — The Leader Post, March 20, 2009
- "Canada: US will ground helicopters" — The Associated Press, March 20, 2009
- ..This is the existing directive..."Sikorsky issued a service bulletin on Jan. 28 indicating the studs should be replaced and that the modification had to be accomplished within the next 1,250 flight hours or within a year of the bulletin being issued."[2][3]
Review 2
edit
Revision 789230 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 789230 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:50, 21 March 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |