Talk:Documentary suggests nuns were excommunicated for exposing paedophilic priest

Review of revision 1101785 [Failed]

Revision 1101785 of this article has been reviewed by Amgine (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: The 'gaga' quote appears to be from the documentary, but the Australian is actually referencing "the Fairfax newspapers", which we *don't* have a source for. Find the original source before quoting. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1101785 of this article has been reviewed by Amgine (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: The 'gaga' quote appears to be from the documentary, but the Australian is actually referencing "the Fairfax newspapers", which we *don't* have a source for. Find the original source before quoting. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1102729 [Passed]

Revision 1102729 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I strongly considered removing much of the massive quote or even failing due to it. Why can't we paraphrase it, or at least quote a little less? The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1102729 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I strongly considered removing much of the massive quote or even failing due to it. Why can't we paraphrase it, or at least quote a little less? The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Edit request

The Mary MacKillop wiki page contradicts this: "The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) said in September 2010 that MacKillop had been "banished after uncovering sex abuse" and cited Father Paul Gardiner in evidence of this. Gardiner described this suggestion as false, saying "Early in 1870, the scandal occurred and the Sisters of Saint Joseph reported it to Father Tenison Woods, but Mary was in Queensland and no one was worried about her." The executive producer of the ABC documentary said that the documentary did not suggest that MacKillop was excommunicated because of her role in exposure of child abuse: "At no stage ... is it claimed Mary MacKillop was excommunicated because she personally reported instances of abuse to the Catholic Church." -citations in the Main. Manannan67 (talk) 03:16, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Not done - @Manannan67:, you are requesting that we alter an article more than 10 years in the past. Wikinews articles are written from what is known at the time. They do not evolve with history even if they are proved wrong later. Furthermore, Wikipedia articles are not reliable sources. Wikinews will issue corrections if mistakes were made given the information available at the time. If you truly have an issue with this article, resubmit your request with sources from 2010 and not just what Wikipedia says. I hope you understand this position. Cheers, --SVTCobra 23:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)