Talk:David Cameron misses Prime Minister's Questions after father suffers stroke
Title
editThe title is very POV. It suggests that the questions were more important than his father's stroke. The news here is the stroke, not the questions. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 11:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1091256 [Failed]
edit
Revision 1091256 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1091256 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 12:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
I don't understand the complaints about the headline
editThe illness is news and is mentioned in the headline. The BBC reported its effect on the business of the country in a similar way.
However, PMQ's is now over, and this article must be updated with at least Clegg's statement to Parliament, if not Jack Straw's question.
--InfantGorilla (talk) 12:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have added the comments made by both Nick Clegg and Jack Straw, now I will just add a sutible source. Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 12:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
- Source Added! Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 12:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1091346 [Passed]
edit
Revision 1091346 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I will share the flack on the headline, as I don't see the bias: to me it emphasizes the seriousness of the illness The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1091346 of this article has been reviewed by InfantGorilla (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I will share the flack on the headline, as I don't see the bias: to me it emphasizes the seriousness of the illness The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
SG
editShould our style guide recommend a consistent way to name number 10 Downing Street? --InfantGorilla (talk) 13:44, 8 September 2010 (UTC)