Talk:DR Congo: Train crash kills more than 30 in Lualaba province

Review of revision 4365079 [Passed]

Revision 4365079 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The length is marginal; I've taken it to be just barely minimal-length; some reviewers would likely judge it slightly below minimal length. There were quite a few passages too close to source, especially considering the length; I was concerned from the start that if I tried to fix those I'd have edited such a large fraction of the minimal article I might have to disqualify myself. Who said what — attribution — needed a number of improvements during review. Attribution is an important facet of journalism. I was a bit concerned about how much of this is through Radio Okapi, but it doesn't seem to be altogether single-source through that bottleneck. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4365079 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The length is marginal; I've taken it to be just barely minimal-length; some reviewers would likely judge it slightly below minimal length. There were quite a few passages too close to source, especially considering the length; I was concerned from the start that if I tried to fix those I'd have edited such a large fraction of the minimal article I might have to disqualify myself. Who said what — attribution — needed a number of improvements during review. Attribution is an important facet of journalism. I was a bit concerned about how much of this is through Radio Okapi, but it doesn't seem to be altogether single-source through that bottleneck. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.