Talk:Crosswords/2005

{{editprotected}}

Since these pages aren't categorized anywhere else, i'd like to have the list contain all of them. It's currently missing only the last two:

• Crosswords/2005/August/11
• Crosswords/2005/September/5

I'd suggest renaming the fourth section as "April-September" to avoid having three very short consecutive sections. Also, the March 20 link has a wrong text of "10 March". -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 09:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

We can't really do much due to archive conventions; could you be more specific (then replace the {{editprotected}} template)? Thanks, Microchip08 (talk) 16:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

The archiving policy shouldn't be a problem in this case, since this isn't a published article, as such. --Pi zero (talk) 17:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the implied support, Pi zero. So is this change still an option?

And i'm still not sure what was there to be "more specific" about... But for completeness' sake, here's what the change would look like, IMO:

Current version	Suggested contents
==April== * [[Crosswords/2005/April/1|1 April 2005]] (missing) * [[Crosswords/2005/April/2|2 April 2005]]	==April== * [[Crosswords/2005/April/1|1 April 2005]] (missing) * [[Crosswords/2005/April/2|2 April 2005]] ==August== * [[Crosswords/2005/August/11|11 August 2005]] ==September== * [[Crosswords/2005/September/5|5 September 2005]]

Maybe move this page to the WN namespace too? -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 07:36, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

• Done Archive conventions in my view apply, in theory, because it was {{publish}}ed. But I don't consider anything in this list to actually be "content" in the sense meant by the policy. So I've made the changes, but left the namespace well alone. BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 15:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)