Talk:Controversial Florida attorney Jack Thompson disbarred

Revision 700104 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 700104 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Controversial

One little thing that is bothering me. Do people think that the characterization of Thompson as "controversial" is fair? I think so, but that may be my POV slipping in. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:18, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

I think it's fair. If you said "nutjob" (which is what he deserves), then it wouldn't be NPoV. Controversial just means that many people disagree with him, which is provably the case. Gopher65_talk 19:20, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

He is very controversial. He's sent porn to judges, walked out of court, tried to get games blocked from release, and otherwise generally been... crazy. His craziness is what got his disbarred. But... since we can't call him "fucking insane" in the article, controversial is fairly NPOV. Alot of people don't like what he's done - that makes him... controversial. --ShakataGaNai ^{^_^} 20:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

"most recent media attention"

What about Bully? --66.67.187.203 22:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)