Talk:Conductor Jeffrey Tate dies aged 74

Ringing endorsement

@Ezarate: Are you talking about Wagner's Ring saga or is A ring of his own another work? Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I closed wrong the italic, it´s Ring, Regards!!! Esteban (talk) 02:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4320301 [Passed]

Revision 4320301 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This had significant distance-from-source problems: a number of passages were much too close to source. I can only do so much, and really had to push my latitude as reviewer as far as it would go in order to get this into shape; had I reviewed this two days ago I unquestionably would have not-ready'd it, for the reporter to revise. There were some facts not found in the sources. The sources should be a complete list of where information was drawn from. Note (in case it's relevant) that Wikipedia cannot be a source, as it's inherently not trust-worthy (and says so). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4320301 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This had significant distance-from-source problems: a number of passages were much too close to source. I can only do so much, and really had to push my latitude as reviewer as far as it would go in order to get this into shape; had I reviewed this two days ago I unquestionably would have not-ready'd it, for the reporter to revise. There were some facts not found in the sources. The sources should be a complete list of where information was drawn from. Note (in case it's relevant) that Wikipedia cannot be a source, as it's inherently not trust-worthy (and says so). The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Request fix

{{editprotected}} The passage "was a at Royal Opera House répétiteur" is incoherent. Looking at the pre-review version, I think removing "at" is the most accurate fix. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:24, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

@Yngvadottir: I agree with your assessment. Fixed. Thanks. --Pi zero (talk) 20:24, 31 December 2017 (UTC)