Talk:China, UN rebuke North Korea for rocket launch

Sources

Editing video from:

• United Nations, "GENEVA / BAN DPRK," UN TV, April 13, 2012 (http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/unifeed/d/19970.html)
• United Nations, "UN / DPRK ROCKET REAX," UN TV, April 13, 2012 (http://www.unmultimedia.org/tv/unifeed/d/19978.html?app=4&lang=en)

"This video is available free of charge and rights-free for news purposes only. No archival footage should be redistributed to third parties without the written consent of the UN or the agency source of the material. Credits should be given to the United Nations and agency source(s)."

Further information about the UN Agenda for Friday came from the UN's daily briefing memo: http://www.un.org/News/ossg/hilites.shtml

I used the following files from Wikimedia Commons:

File:Kim Il-sung.jpg File:All hail Kim Jong Il.jpg

and

File:Yellow Sea.PNG

Crtew (talk) 15:15, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Production quality

I made this video with low tech tools. I used iMovie (iTunes & iPhoto) on a Mac book with a handheld Sony IC Recorder for audio voice over. After editing in a .MOV format, I converted the file to .OGV. If approved, I think there would have to be a few touch ups. Space needs to go before and after the current movie; it doesn't breathe enough. The last audio ends too abruptly for that reason. The sound needs more control when there are two layered voice tracks, which occurs at the introduction of Susan Rice. Also one of the videos is saving in the wrong screen ratio. Any other suggestions? Does this need a creative commons license in audio format like the ""News briefs"? Crtew (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Made all the corrections I can. Crtew (talk) 02:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Removed dubious "review" tag

Please do not use IP address for edit of "Please review this article. (moved using js via button)". Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 21:53, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Submitted Crtew (talk) 02:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

For review

The piece has been submitted for review.

Review of revision 1473133 [Passed]

Revision 1473133 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I decided to keep the video despite its flaws (as noted on the talk page) but I came very close to pulling it. Either way, there's a limit to how long we can sit on this awaiting a repaired vid. Good job on the article, though. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1473133 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I decided to keep the video despite its flaws (as noted on the talk page) but I came very close to pulling it. Either way, there's a limit to how long we can sit on this awaiting a repaired vid. Good job on the article, though. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

The video was repaired and the new one has been up since publication.Crtew (talk) 13:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I must have missed that. I watched it earlier and assumed it was still one and the same. Which is, of course, why we strongly frown upon assumptions here. Whoops! Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 21:23, 22 April 2012 (UTC)