Talk:Chelsea Clinton engaged to banker Marc Mezvinsky
Review of revision 917845 [Passed]
edit
Revision 917845 of this article has been reviewed by PatrickFlaherty (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 917845 of this article has been reviewed by PatrickFlaherty (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Some contradictory info was removed from this article a while ago, bringing it to under the minimum three-paragraph size. It would have been tagged as {{minimal}} if it weren't already published. I'm not interested in writing about celebrity "fluff", but could someone else perhaps fill in the article with a third paragraph? Cheers, Tempodivalse [talk] 02:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- Probably too late to add anything now, it's past the 48-hour deadline per WN:ARCHIVE. Looks like this will have to remain as-is. Tempodivalse [talk] 04:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Typo
edit"Coupled" should be "couple".
- Fixed. Thanks. --Pi zero (talk) 22:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)